Recently the 16000 bhp
offshore vessel the Fairmount Expedition, owned and operated by Fairmount BV
was moving between contracts when it had to opportunity of assisting with an
emergency in the channel. A cargo vessel the Katja, had broken down and was
drifting in a channel shipping lane. The ship took the casualty in tow and
took it to Dover where the Katja was taken into port by the harbour tugs.
This was fortuitous for
the Katja, and everyone else. It will fuel the arguments for and against the
removal of the emergency towing vessels. The government will say that they
were right to suggest that commercial vessels would be able to take over the
task of carrying out salvage round the UK coasts, and those who wish to
retain the service would be able to say that the event provides evidence
that ETVs are needed. After all, if the Fairmount Expedition had been
somewhere else the Katja might have drifted ashore on Bournemouth beach,
belching forth hundreds of tons of heavy fuel oil, and causing severe oiling
of a variety of wildlife.
There's a joke here
somewhere but I have not quite found it. Some French MPs are not laughing
either, because one of their ETVs, the Abeille Languedoc, has been moved
from the Atlantic coast to the channel to cater for the departure of the
THE 9/11 EFFECT
Over the last few days we
have been treated, if that's the right word, to replays of the awful events
of September 11th 2001 when two passenger aircraft were flown into the World
Trade Centre towers in New York. Important people and relatives of
those who had lost their lives gathered at what has now become known as
Ground Zero to remember the event and to pay tribute.
For the rest of us the
effect on our lives has been that we necessarily have to go through a
variety of security screens at airports. Some we can see are more or less ineffective, and in others we have to
suffer from the overbearing attitudes of poorly educated but heavily badged
security staff. Yet elsewhere, outside the airports we can see that if anyone really wanted to
they could create mayhem, and this was illustrated during
the summer when a Norwegian nutter was able to plant a bomb in Oslo
and then shoot sixty odd people at a gathering on an island to the north.
Importantly for seafarers,
the 9/11 effect has resulted in the International Ship and Port Facility
Security Code, which for those not familiar with this legislation, has
resulted in all ships of over 500 grt having to be provided with a Security
Manual identifying responsible personnel, and providing guidance and
instructions as to how the vessel is to be made secure. Ports have also had
to secure their boundaries with proper fencing and manned gates, which in
some cases has resulted in major capital expenditure. But how much good has
all this done? It did not stop a bunch of heavily armed terrorists leaving a
port in Pakistan and disembarking from some sort of craft within the port
area of Mumbai. And it has resulted in shipmasters being
bewildered by the arrival on board of unfriendly, heavily armed, uniformed
personnel in some parts of the world. Who would know whether they were
terrorists or police?
And lastly, for the
average mariner, it has resulted in even greater restrictions on their
ability to leave their ships during what for most are very brief stays in
port. The Americans in particular have always been suspicious of seafarers,
and there are probably retired mariners who remember the less than
humanitarian inspections which took place when British ships visited
American ports after the war. Now, with the constant threat of attack, it
seems to have been assumed that all seafarers are potential terrorists, and
port operators use the law as an excuse to prevent anyone stepping ashore.
Even though the American Coastguard has stepped forward to try to improve
the situation it seems unlikely that things are going to get better.
You may remember the
Chandlers, the British couple who were sailing in the Indian Ocean when they
were captured by Somali pirates, and who were released by the pirates on
payment of a $1,000,000 ransom. Apparently the government of Somalia may have
contributed to the payment just to get rid of these two old people. Now
they, the Chandlers, have written a book in which apparently they have put
down on paper how they feel about the support, or lack of it, they received
from the British government.
I heard them on the radio.
They seemed to have approached their plight with the use of two
parallel excuses. Excuses? Already it seems that I have made a judgement
without even reading their book, and it may be based on my view of yachtsmen
in general, but anyway here is what the Chandlers thought. Firstly, they
thought that the possibility of pirate attack was just one of the things
they had to face as yachtsmen, like dealing with seriously adverse weather,
and floating containers in the night, and secondly they did not think that
they would be faced with the problem because they had not been warned about
The two reasons, if that
is what they were, seem to fit together, and it appears to me that they
adopted the attitude of many yachtspeople, that they have embarked on an
adventure, and too much information will reduce the excitement. As one
expert pointed out, on the same day that they had appeared on chat shows to
promote their book, at the time that they had departed from the Seychelles
there were warning on the UK Foreign Office site and there was a Notice to
Mariners in circulation warning mariners of the possible dangers of sailing
in the areas where they were taken hostage. What more can one say?
THE BEAR ISLAND WRECK
A decision has been taken
by the Norwegian marine authorities not to attempt to remove the wreck of
the Petrozavodsk, a small Russian cargo ship which ran into a cliff on the
south side of the arctic Bear Island. Bear Island is in the Arctic circle to
the south of the Norwegian island of Svalbard and to the west of Russian
Novaya Zemlya all to the north of Murmansk. I'm just trying to give the
impression here that it gets very cold there at some times of the year.
Anyway I did a little
research into this accident and found that when it occurred in 2009
the master and the first mate were prosecuted for being drunk in charge of a
ship, so it looks as if I should extend my advice - currently when on
passage to an oil rig do not head straight towards it - to include islands
The Norwegian authorities
have decided not to attempt to remove the wreck because of the danger from
falling rocks, it is that close to the cliff. and the news reports state
that in the aftermath of the accident numerous seabirds were found to have
been killed and injured. None of the reports have bothered to tell us
whether there were any human casualties.
I see from the weekly tug
emagazine "Tugs and Towing" that Smit-Lloyd are having a re-union. I
have written so much about them over the years that I almost feel that I
should be invited. When you google Smit-Lloyd I notice that Ships and Oil is
fifth on page one, and two of the images are from my website.
Anyway, years ago I and
others decided to have a Star Offshore re-union in Aberdeen. Although quite
a few people said they were going to come along, in the end there were about
ten of us which initially was a bit of a disappointment but we soon forgot
about our small numbers and had a really wonderful evening reminiscing about
all the stuff that had happened to us back then when the company was in its
heyday. For those who don't know, Star was bought by Stirling in the mid
1990s and later Stirling was bought by Seacor (Read all about it in "The
History of the Supply Ship" available elsewhere on this site).
But back to Smit-Lloyd.
Just in case there are any ex Smit-Lloyders reading this who have not
received this information from other sources, the event is to take place on
12th November 2011 at the Regardz Airport Hotel in Rotterdam, and to find
out more they should email
firstname.lastname@example.org . It sounds as if it is going to be a bit
upmarket compared with our event which took place in the Blue Lamp, the
Gallowgate in Aberdeen.
I have always admired the
concept of training mariners in shiphandling by providing miniature ship
with scale power and directional control. The training facility at Warsash
has recently been in the news because they have moved from Marchwood to
Timsbury lake where their press releases say that they now have seven ships
which can replicate different types of vessel from a ferry to a 300,00 tonne
tanker. There are also four radio controlled tugs and a jack-up oil rig.
They say that the lake has
a number of facilities available for training purposes, including a canal
with a scale length of four miles and a harbour area with 19 jetties.
The advantage of such training is that even though the ships themselves
respond in a similar manner to the real thing - ie hardly in any discernable
way - the resulting collisions are limited to scratched paintwork.
The press release also
says that there has been an introduction of a course concentrating on twin
screw vessels, focusing particularly on the offshore industry. But one
assumes that since there is not a supply vessel amongst the fleet, this part
of the training is carried out on a simulator. I sometimes wonder who is
doing this training of supply vessel drivers, and what form the simulators
take, and hence whether the results are any good. I did have a go on a
simulator at the oil show once and it was OK, but it was more like a
computer game. Do these training aids really make your palms sweat?
Victor Gibson. September 2011.