WWW.SHIPSANDOIL.COM
home   Picture of the Day     ship information   articles and features     news and views   publications   webcam 

Locations of visitors to this page

HOME
PICTURE OF THE DAY
NORTH EUROPEAN SHIPS
SOUTH ATLANTIC AND CARRIBEAN
INDIA AND INDIAN OCEAN
NORTH AMERICAN SHIPS
FAR EAST AND AUSTRALIA
MEDITERRANEAN AND MIDDLE EAST
ARTICLES AND FEATURES
NEWS AND VIEWS
PUBLICATIONS
WEBCAM

 

PREVIOUS

SEPTEMBER 2002 NEWSLETTER

NEXT

Seacor Sales

As we trawled though the various publications we receive for the update of the newbuildings page we detected a bit of a pattern which may not yet be evident to others. Seacor sold a couple of 5000 bhp, but recently built Gulf of Mexico anchor handlers to a Vietnamese company in June as well as selling the 1985 built Stirling Spica to Nomis. They have followed these disposals with the sale of the Stirling Islay and Jura to BUE which will take them off to the Caspian.

In the current market one could almost understand the disposal of the smaller vessels because their use would be limited to jack-up moving but the new VS483s are a different matter. These two vessels are the largest of the Seacor fleet and even though they are seen in the North Sea as being economy models they are still fairly potent vessels. Nomis has also appeared to have made a good purchase. The Stirling Sirius and Spica were the Shell chartered anchor-handlers for 15 years which speaks volumes for the suitability of the design.

Meanwhile some of the older Seacor vessels in the North Sea have been converted into Standby Vessels and have joined the Boston Putford fleet. 

All shipowners say that their fleets are for sale at the right price, and this flurry of disposals may be no more than that. If so we would expect Seacor to be placing an order for something somewhere soon.      

Shetland Ferry News

The British newspapers could make a good headline out of this item, but we have avoided it, and while it is not strictly oil industry stuff, it is big for the port of Aberdeen.

After heaven knows how long the P&O have lost the contract to provide a passenger ferry service to the northern isles. And for those who think Aberdeen is a long way north you have to go another twelve hours by ferry to get to Lerwick. 

The new service providers are Northlink whose origins lie with Caledonian Macbrain who already provide inter-island services in the western isles and between the islands in the Orknies and the Shetland Islands. They have had three ferries constructed in Finland and have purchased a second hand cargo ferry whose purpose is essentially to take the stuff which cannot be transported on the vehicle decks of the car ferries.  So on the 30th October the St Clair, the St Sunniva and the St Rognvald ceased to ply the route northward and the Hjatland and its sisters took up the service.

The St Sunniva is off the Egypt to be re-incarnated as something else, and she may be remembered as the Panther plying the route between Dover and Calais back in the 70s, and the St Clair is apparently to be used on a new service between the Faeroes and Aberdeen.

Meanwhile a number of entrepreneurs have seen an opportunity for competition in the carriage of freight probably because the new company set its rates a bit high, thinking they had the upper hand. A new service using the old St Rognvald (pronounced Ronald) and another larger freight ferry has started up between Aberdeen and points north and there is heavy competition on the routes across the Pentland Firth to Orkney. Meanwhile Streamline continue to operate their container service to the north with the cargo ship Naviga.

As a result of all this activity Aberdeen is almost as full of ferries as Piraeus, and supply vessels on the spot market have to anchor out in the bay because there is no room for them on Blakies Quay.  Northlink have responded to the competition by lowering their vehicle rates which may have come as a bit of a shock to the opposition, and  we on the sidelines wait to see how it is all going to go in the next twelve months.     

BP Move to Aberdeen

This is not a BP newsletter - honestly! But more BP news. After weeks of rumour BP have declared the fact that they are moving from Peterhead to Aberdeen. Although we had heard the rumours we were doubtful about the possibility. After all - where would they put the ships we reasoned. The port is already full. 

We had reckoned without the developments at Albert Quay which was formerly the scenic resting place for fifty or so non-operational fishing boats. Traditionally the fishermen would bring their craft up the harbour and when they got to Albert Quay they would turn left and elbow their way between the boats already tied up until they could get a line ashore forward. They would then stop the engine and pile into their people carrier which would take them home to Macduff, Portsoy or Hopeman. We should have known. All the boats have gone to Peterhead, and Albert Quay has been dredged and upgraded.

Of course in this world when there are winners there are also losers and the winner in the fishing competition has been Peterhead - the loser in the BP competition. The howls of pain from the oil related businesses in Peterhead echo those of the businesses in Dundee when BP left Shed 16 twenty or so years ago. Of course one of the casualties is the concept of the integrated transport service. When the possibility was first muted by Asco in 1990 odd we questioned the idea (This article reproduced on the site) basically because it would be so difficult for an integrated service to deal with hot shots. And so it has proved. Of course Asco and others have raised the levels of efficiency of the operation in general, but once these lessons are learnt they cease to be a commercial advantage. Everybody can use them, and doubtless BP will. 

The 10,000 Year Storm

The HSE on line magazine Offshore Research Focus provides some background this month into the interest of some inspectors in the 10,000 year storm. What!! you may exclaim - the 10,000 year storm!

Well QRA "Quantitative Risk Analysis" looks at numbers and time-lines. It indicates that we British have a slightly higher chance of being struck by lightning than winning the national lottery, and it allows a calculation to be made which determined the likelihood of survival of people at work. In UK the HSE like to see that people will have more than 1 x 10-3 chances of survival at work. This means that an individual can expect to be able to be at work for 1000 years before accidentally being killed. 

We should consider here that the average oil rig is designed to be able to survive the 100 year storm, which in QRA terms is every other day. But if proper precautions are taken and with sufficient warning we would all expect that the 100 year storm could be dealt with. As for the 10,000 year storm, in addition to knowing what the management of the average oil rig is going to do, the government might want to know what Swindon Council has in mind. The last time there was a major storm in the West Country the population was endangered by flying roof tiles, and pedestrians were injured by speeding baby-buggies with the babies still in them. One assumes that next time there will  be television advertisments warning mothers about the dangers of taking their babies out in 100 mile an hour winds. 

It was 13,000 years ago that civilisation as we know it first took root in the fertile crescent between the Tigris and the Euphrates, probably imortalised by the Bible as the Garden of Eden, and it was some time after that, that Noah and the animals ended up in the Ark. Was that a 10,000 year storm or a 1000 year storm? It is now 25,000 years since the last Ice Age.  Should we be considering the possibility of the rigs being iced into the North Sea. It has after all happened before.

It seems to me that since one can hardy make an issue of the figures if we assume that this 10,000 year storm would be the end of our theoretical oil rig, there must be something wrong with the requirement to carry out the QRA and to do anything about it when the results are not in our favour. If the 10,000 year storm would result in the loss of our theoretical rig then it would also result in the loss of all the rigs in the North Sea. And worse, it would result in the loss of all the flimsy structures we call houses. They are after all just bricks balanced one on top of another. And to have a chance of survival all the ships in all the ports would have to put to sea . And as for flying helicopters - forget it!

Come to think of it, if we battened down the hatches an oil rig might not be such a bad place to be. 

 

Rigs and Rigging

The Energy Day recently reported that there were 12-14 rigs in the Cromarty Firth and that the number was shortly to increase, and ever since Mr Brown announced the new oil tax the predicted number of exploration rigs in the Cromarty Firth has been predicted as being 20.

The current total number of rigs in the Cromarty Firth is six, although there are also a couple in Belfast a couple in Rotterdam and four in Norway. Of course we have never actually used the total in Europe as a yardstick to measure the state of the oil industry, so is this different, or have there always been a few rigs which no-one wants, or which are undergoing major upgrades. When things were humming and as a consequence several rigs were in the throes of major upgrades did anybody consider the effect on the market if they were brought back into play.  Is the fact that the average day rate for a rig move is now £11,000 and this time last year it was £24,000 due to the fact that things are not as busy as they were last year, or due to the fact that a large number of vessels have arrived on the market. 

But we try not to discuss money. Its easier to deal with the 10,000 year storm. 

FOR INDEX OF NEWS AND VIEWS CLICK HERE


 

NEWSLETTERS

December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007
 April 2007
 March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
June 2005
April 2005
Feb 2005
Jan 2005
Nov 2004
Oct 2004
Sept 2004
August 2004

July 2004

May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
 
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
 
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002 
July/Aug 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000